The Sexual Revolution Is A Form Of Capitalism (The Irony Of Leftism)

blkpillpres

Staff member
Moderator
#1
I always find it ironic that leftists don't see the parallels between socialism and inceldom.

If you allow for a free market, very few will thrive and most will stagnate or fail completely, naturally monopolies will form, and that will lead to vast wealth inequality and classism, and that cycle will be perpetuated as those who never succeed will die off in poverty and/or pass on meager scraps to their children, while the elites of society will pass down vast wealth endlessly throughout their genetic line. So leftists want to restore the means of production back to the common man to make things fairer

ITS THE SAME THING WITH SEX AND REPRODUCTION

If you allow a "free market" in relation to sex, where women can be promiscuous and hypergamous, with no barrings, no social pressure to prevent it, then very few men will thrive in the sexual market (have amazing fulfilling sex lives, many one night stands, friends with benefits, not being cheated on, etc) and most will stagnate (betabuxx, open relationships) or fail completely (inceldom)

Naturally monopolies will form (women have a monopoly over sexual resources by default) and due to their dating practices an 80/20 rule takes prominence and the elite 20% males basically have a monopoly, over the majority of feasible (effort matches reward) access to sexual resources. This obviously leads to vast inequality in sex and romantic relationships, also with the "quality" of mates the average man can acquire, in most cases a man will have to settle for a woman who is significantly below his league due to the skewing of the natural market order

This cycle will be perpetuated as those men with average and below average genetics don't even get to reproduce, or they breed with women who are even lower than them on the scale of attractiveness, producing more and more unattractive males, endlessly, and if even through genetic recombination a man ends up with a 5/10 son through luck, that son will likely have to date and marry 4/10s and below so the cycle still repeats


Whilst the Chads of society reproduce with the most attractive women, producing for the most part attractive sons, who will use the amazing genetics that was bestowed upon them to easily date and have amazing sex lives, and it goes on and on like this

So incels just want to restore the means of sex and reproduction back to the average man to make things fairer

To be against capitalism, and to be for the sexual revolution is a very ironic and contradictory stance, because the sexual revolution, was the capitalist movement in relation to sexual resources
 

Inceptor

Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
#2
I always find it ironic that leftists don't see the parallels between socialism and inceldom.

If you allow for a free market, very few will thrive and most will stagnate or fail completely, naturally monopolies will form, and that will lead to vast wealth inequality and classism, and that cycle will be perpetuated as those who never succeed will die off in poverty and/or pass on meager scraps to their children, while the elites of society will pass down vast wealth endlessly throughout their genetic line. So leftists want to restore the means of production back to the common man to make things fairer

ITS THE SAME THING WITH SEX AND REPRODUCTION

If you allow a "free market" in relation to sex, where women can be promiscuous and hypergamous, with no barrings, no social pressure to prevent it, then very few men will thrive in the sexual market (have amazing fulfilling sex lives, many one night stands, friends with benefits, not being cheated on, etc) and most will stagnate (betabuxx, open relationships) or fail completely (inceldom)

Naturally monopolies will form (women have a monopoly over sexual resources by default) and due to their dating practices an 80/20 rule takes prominence and the elite 20% males basically have a monopoly, over the majority of feasible (effort matches reward) access to sexual resources. This obviously leads to vast inequality in sex and romantic relationships, also with the "quality" of mates the average man can acquire, in most cases a man will have to settle for a woman who is significantly below his league due to the skewing of the natural market order

This cycle will be perpetuated as those men with average and below average genetics don't even get to reproduce, or they breed with women who are even lower than them on the scale of attractiveness, producing more and more unattractive males, endlessly, and if even through genetic recombination a man ends up with a 5/10 son through luck, that son will likely have to date and marry 4/10s and below so the cycle still repeats

Whilst the Chads of society reproduce with the most attractive women, producing for the most part attractive sons, who will use the amazing genetics that was bestowed upon them to easily date and have amazing sex lives, and it goes on and on like this

So incels just want to restore the means of sex and reproduction back to the average man to make things fairer

To be against capitalism, and to be for the sexual revolution is a very ironic and contradictory stance, because the sexual revolution, was the capitalist movement in relation to sexual resources
They vote what is good for themselfs, not for the country. Most leftist are women so that explains their voting patterns. Women are consumers, they don't care about others, it is not in their biology.
 
Top